Session: 07-03-01 Risk-Informed Decision-Making

Paper Number: 133702

133702 - Incorporating Risk-Informed Methodologies to Complement Deterministic Integrity Decision-Making in the Gas Industry 

Abstract: 

This paper illustrates the practical application of risk-informed methodologies to complement existing deterministic methods for managing the integrity of gas-carrying assets. This approach aims to enhance the understanding of uncertainty and its role in decision-making while offering a supplementary lens for managing asset condition. It can be particularly relevant when managing the safety and reliability of hydrocarbon-carrying assets in an evolving energy landscape, where additional quantification and justification may become necessary for driving toward optimized remediation or replacement decisions.

Historically, deterministic methods were generally sufficient to inform decisions when managing asset integrity threats.  Though such approaches remain relevant, they can present limitations, especially when effective systemic prioritization is required for complex systems encompassing dissimilar assets, such as distribution and transmission piping, various facilities, and underground storage assets.  More advanced data-driven models utilizing multiple risk assessment techniques can benefit operators in these cases, particularly as more industry codes and standards evolve accordingly.

The authors of this paper highlight how they successfully adopted this approach in the Integrity Department at Enbridge Gas Inc. (EGI) in Ontario, Canada.  They do so by describing the team’s comprehensive decision-making lifecycle and providing practical illustrations of how risk-based evaluations were layered over deterministic outcomes to better define asset condition and optimize mitigation strategies.  In their first case study, they examine the overlay of the two approaches for an urban distribution network servicing tens of thousands of natural gas customers. In this illustration, incorporating and quantifying data uncertainty in probabilistic computations results in divergent conclusions between the two assessment streams, an outcome explored in the paper.  In their second example, the authors describe a recent application of probabilistic risk evaluations following traditional deterministic analyses of axial and circumferential magnetic flux leakage (MFL-A and MFL-C) in-line inspection (ILI) data on a transmission pipeline. Finally, they present a third application to exemplify the interconnectedness between the deterministic and risk methodologies when prioritizing integrity decisions on underground gas storage assets. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed to underline the criticality of using both approaches concurrently to optimize the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of decision-making. 

Presenting Author: Mohamed Chebaro Enbridge Gas Inc.

Presenting Author Biography: Mohamed Chebaro holds a Mechanical Engineering degree from the University of Alberta and an M.A. in Leadership from the University of Guelph. He is registered as a professional engineer in Alberta and Ontario.

Mohamed started his career as a consultant in the Energy sector in Edmonton before joining Enbridge, where he has held different roles in Operations, Engineering, Hydrogen and Telemetry in Alberta, Quebec, and Ontario. He is currently the Director of Integrity and Risk at Enbridge Gas in Toronto.

Mohamed is active in various industry organizations, boards, and technical committees and has authored several technical publications globally, including at IPC since 2008. He enjoys reading about history and leadership and travelling with his wife and three kids.

Authors:

Mohamed Chebaro Enbridge Gas Inc.
Kai Ji Enbridge Gas Inc.
Miaad Safari Enbridge Gas Inc.
Danielle Turney Enbridge Gas Inc.
Mike Hildebrand Enbridge Gas Inc.